fftc:FWDIntersections
ReportsReview generated briefsFoliosManage source packetsFeedbackTrack review punch listHelpReview guide and workflow
Live site

Feedback

Review punch list.

Feedback from emails and generated reports is organized into one trackable list with status, owner, reporter, and source.

Set ADMIN_PASSWORD before public deployment.
Total items13New0Clarifying2In progress10Acknowledged1Done0

Filters

Showing 10 of 13 items

Clear filters
StatusIn progress
New0Clarifying2Acknowledged1*In progress10Done0
OwnerAll
FFTC3Priceless13
ReporterIsh Salgado
*Ish Salgado13
SourceImported
*Imported13Reports0

Items

Feedback inbox

10 shown
New0

No items in this section.

Clarifying0

No items in this section.

In progress10

I imagine there may be users who want to just select two topics. Is it possible to make it clear that this is an option as well?

ReporterIsh SalgadoOwnerPricelessSourceImportedSource detailIsh Salgado email, May 6, 2026

For now, remove the Why do these topics matter to you? section. It is a fantastic feature, but we don't know what people will write and produce with our branding that can be sent out in the open. It is probably best to leave out for now to make sure there are strong controls on what can be entered and produced.

ReporterIsh SalgadoOwnerPricelessSourceImportedSource detailIsh Salgado email, May 6, 2026

We like the What is your purpose? section and can think through how to best categorize and frame these cases. That said, it may be worth adding in smaller text an option to opt-out of making a selection here.

ReporterIsh SalgadoOwnerFFTC + PricelessSourceImportedSource detailIsh Salgado email, May 6, 2026

FFTC:fwd needs to be re-written in lowercase first: fftc:FWD. We made this switch recently so have had to change in many places ourselves!

ReporterIsh SalgadoOwnerPricelessSourceImportedSource detailIsh Salgado email, May 6, 2026

The analysis report took a few minutes to load for me and may turn away some users depending on how long it takes to load. It took longer if I entered text into the add context part (which again, I think should be removed for now).

ReporterIsh SalgadoOwnerPricelessSourceImportedSource detailIsh Salgado email, May 6, 2026

Looking at the Compounding Cycle section, the information helps connect the dots at a very high-level, but it feels as though it is generic and could apply to any combination of topics. Image below.

ReporterIsh SalgadoOwnerPricelessSourceImportedSource detailIsh Salgado email, May 6, 2026

/Users/jruck/Desktop/e04bb857-6302-40c7-8245-081a3615ee78.png

Overall (and like the point listed above), the information does not go in depth to where it should probably end up. Even when I added pretty detailed context into why the topics matter for me, the information it produced felt generic in a way that could apply to all possible combination results.

ReporterIsh SalgadoOwnerPricelessSourceImportedSource detailIsh Salgado email, May 6, 2026

/Users/jruck/Downloads/Intersections 1.pdf

The report should link back into the folio or to links, organizations and resources already on the platform if applicable since those have been vetted. That is not to say that we shouldn't allow it to pull from other sources either, but the priority should remain on what we have produced in our core narrative content.

ReporterIsh SalgadoOwnerFFTC + PricelessSourceImportedSource detailIsh Salgado email, May 6, 2026

Is it possible to have a more customized name for the downloaded pdf file, or will it be the same file name for all pdfs?

ReporterIsh SalgadoOwnerPricelessSourceImportedSource detailIsh Salgado email, May 6, 2026

How does a user go from the report back to the original intersections page where they can select topics?

ReporterIsh SalgadoOwnerPricelessSourceImportedSource detailIsh Salgado email, May 6, 2026
Acknowledged0

No items in this section.

Done0

No items in this section.