Review punch list.

Remove the themes listed in each bubble - we will need to confirm what our selection of themes are.

We can move away from the "Pairing" feature when choosing three topics. If anything, the feature highlighting an experience or a "journey" through the topics can be made more prominent.

I imagine there may be users who want to just select two topics. Is it possible to make it clear that this is an option as well?

For now, remove the Why do these topics matter to you? section. It is a fantastic feature, but we don't know what people will write and produce with our branding that can be sent out in the open. It is probably best to leave out for now to make sure there are strong controls on what can be entered and produced.

We like the What is your purpose? section and can think through how to best categorize and frame these cases. That said, it may be worth adding in smaller text an option to opt-out of making a selection here.

FFTC:fwd needs to be re-written in lowercase first: fftc:FWD. We made this switch recently so have had to change in many places ourselves!

The analysis report took a few minutes to load for me and may turn away some users depending on how long it takes to load. It took longer if I entered text into the add context part (which again, I think should be removed for now).

Looking at the Compounding Cycle section, the information helps connect the dots at a very high-level, but it feels as though it is generic and could apply to any combination of topics. Image below.

Overall (and like the point listed above), the information does not go in depth to where it should probably end up. Even when I added pretty detailed context into why the topics matter for me, the information it produced felt generic in a way that could apply to all possible combination results.

The report should link back into the folio or to links, organizations and resources already on the platform if applicable since those have been vetted. That is not to say that we shouldn't allow it to pull from other sources either, but the priority should remain on what we have produced in our core narrative content.

Is it possible to have a more customized name for the downloaded pdf file, or will it be the same file name for all pdfs?

How does a user go from the report back to the original intersections page where they can select topics?

User experience is fantastic. It captures the fftc:FWD brand identity perfectly and stays true to the folio structure by including facts and articles. I think this would be the most utilized feature on the website.